Eric Holder Unequivocally Rejects Torture

eric-holder-hearingsThis is something I’ve been waiting to hear for a long time – a straightforward, clear rejection of torture from someone with the power to do something about it. It comes from Eric Holder, in his confirmation hearings for the post of Attorney General in the Obama administration:

Asked just minutes into his confirmation hearings whether waterboarding qualified as torture, Holder was unequivocal in his response.

“If you look at the history of the use of that technique used by the Khmer Rouge, used in the inquisition, used by the Japanese and prosecuted by us as war crimes – we prosecuted our own soldiers in Vietnam – I agree with you, Mr. Chairman, waterboarding is torture,” said the former deputy Attorney General.

Holder and Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy subsequently went through a checklist of sorts as to where the legal limits of interrogation measures stood.

Would other countries have the authority to torture captured U.S. citizens if they deemed it a national security threat?

“No, they would not,” replied Holder. “It would violate the international obligations that I think all civilized nations have agreed to, the Geneva Conventions.”

Could the president, if need be, use his authority as commander in chief to override acts that prohibit illegal interrogation practices or torture?

“No one is above the law,” said Holder. “The president has a constitutional obligation to faithfully execute the laws of the United States. There are obligations that we have as a result of treaties we have signed and obligations to the Constitution.”

Watching the process of the transition to an Obama administration from the outside, it sometimes feels as if he and his advisers are approaching subjects that they have had strong opinions about in the abstract for years, and realizing they are now responsible for dealing with these things in the real world, which leads them to toy with the idea that maybe there’s a good reason for some of the practices that they opposed before it was up to them. Maybe there are times when torture is necessary, for instance. Cheney seems to think it’s absolutely necessary. Sure, he seems like a man without a conscience, but maybe a conscience gets in the way when it comes time to make tough decisions.

Then, when you ask them outright, is waterboarding (known as water torture before Bush and Cheney renamed it) torture? it’s as if they shake the cobwebs from their heads and remember what we’re talking about here, and they have to say, Of course it is. And is torture illegal? Well, when you put it that way, of course it’s illegal. But even if torture’s illegal, that doesn’t mean the president can’t do it sometimes when he deems it absolutely necessary, right? Wait a minute – that can’t be right. No way. Torture’s illegal, period.

Special thanks to the Senate Judiciary Committee for asking these obvious questions.

Visit to let the Obama administration know that you support applying the law equally when it comes to torture.

~ by lolarusa on January 15, 2009.

3 Responses to “Eric Holder Unequivocally Rejects Torture”

  1. Good answer, Mr. Holder!

    I’m reading about Cheney and Addington in the White House right now, and it’s just amazing what they thought they could get away with. John Ashcroft comes out looking pretty good, actually, but Eric Holder will definitely be the best AG we’ve had in a long time.

  2. It’s about time.

  3. Speaking of U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder:

    Eric Holder is a racial-minority individual, and in his heart and mind he inevitably does not endorse hate crimes committed by George W. Bush.

    George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).

    George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

    And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.

    Many people know what Bush did.

    And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.

    Bush was absolute evil.

    Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

    Bush is a psychological prisoner.

    Bush has a lot to worry about.

    Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

    In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

    Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
    B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
    Messiah College, Grantham, PA
    Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

    I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: